*** Iran and US inch toward deal as naval blockade and nuclear questions loom | THE DAILY TRIBUNE | KINGDOM OF BAHRAIN

Iran and US inch toward deal as naval blockade and nuclear questions loom

TDT | Manama | Email : online@newsofbahrain.com 

The naval blockade: a central bargaining chip

One of the most concrete elements to emerge from the Iranian readout is the question of the US naval blockade. According to Iranian state media, Tehran has made ending the blockade a core component of the framework under discussion, signalling that maritime access and the flow of Gulf shipping are directly tied to any political resolution.

The United States separately announced that 100 ships have already been redirected as part of what Washington described as an Iran maritime blockade milestone, underlining the scale of disruption to regional trade and energy flows that a prolonged standoff would entail.

Oil markets brace for prolonged disruption

Fresh uncertainty surrounds the Strait of Hormuz as reports suggest Iran is also exploring a shipping payment framework with Oman. Concerns are mounting over a possible global oil supply crunch, tightened Iranian airspace restrictions, and signs of heightened US military readiness—all of which have added to the Gulf's fragile atmosphere.

Nuclear issue: off the table for now

In a significant signal about the sequencing of talks, Tehran explicitly stated on Saturday that Iran's nuclear programme will not be discussed at the current stage of mediation. Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei said the priority is ending active conflicts on multiple fronts, including Lebanon, before nuclear specifics are addressed.

Baghaei added that the timing of any future nuclear discussions remains undecided, and described the overall mediation process as "time-consuming" given the depth of long-standing tensions between the two countries. Several proposals and points of wording remain under review. He also thanked Pakistan for its role in supporting the mediation effort.

Pakistan's mediation role and Hezbollah's demands

Pakistan has emerged as a key conduit in the indirect negotiations between Tehran and Washington. Iranian proposals have been relayed through Pakistani mediators, with Hezbollah confirming on Saturday that its chief Naim Qassem received a message from Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi through that channel.

The Lebanese group said the message indicated that Iran "will not give up its support for movements demanding justice and freedom, foremost among them Hezbollah." The statement also revealed that Iran's latest proposal, delivered through Pakistani mediators, explicitly called for a ceasefire in Lebanon to be included in any permanent resolution to the war.

Washington's signals: optimism, with caveats

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, speaking to reporters in New Delhi on Saturday, offered the most publicly optimistic assessment yet from Washington. He said there was a "chance" that Iran could accept a deal as soon as that same day, adding he hoped for "good news."

"There is a chance that, whether it's later today, tomorrow, in a couple days, we may have something to say," Rubio told reporters. His comments followed a social media post by President Donald Trump featuring a map of Iran overlaid with a US flag and the phrase "United States of the Middle East !!" — a message that drew attention but was not accompanied by any official policy statement.

Where things stand

As of Saturday evening, the picture is one of cautious, incremental movement. Iran has publicly outlined a 14-point framework, excluded its nuclear programme from immediate talks, tied the lifting of the US naval blockade to any agreement, and demanded Lebanon be part of a wider ceasefire. Pakistan continues to shuttle proposals between the sides. Washington has acknowledged the possibility of a breakthrough in days, while stopping short of declaring one.

The structural gaps between the two sides remain wide. The naval blockade and its impact on global oil markets, the fate of Lebanon, the longer-term question of Iran's nuclear activities, and the broader political conditions each side demands — all of these will need to be resolved before any durable end to the conflict becomes possible.